The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed DYK. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
… that Rene Auberjonois reprised the role of Desaad in "Twilight" almost twenty years after playing it in SuperFriends: The Legendary Super Powers Show and The Super Powers Team: Galactic Guardians?
Support
Rather interesting. ― Thailog 21:07, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
Didn't know that until I came to this site. -- SFH 20:16, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
This is the first I've heard. Very interesting piece of trivia. - Caswin 23:33, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
Oppose
Comments
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed DYK. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Curious, since Mark Hamil was not the first choice. ― Thailog 21:07, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
Mark Hamill's Joker is how I imagine Joker's voice in the comics. Oh, what might have been... -- SFH 20:16, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
Another item worth having. That said... - Caswin 23:33, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
Oppose
Comments
I read a discussion on this topic in the "World's Finest" forum. Word is (don't ask me how they found out), one of the reasons they replaced Tim Curry was that, while he was his usual terrifying self, his interpretation was a little too generic to do justice to the Joker. By contrast, nobody could call Mark Hamill's Joker anything but distinctive. - Caswin 23:33, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed DYK. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Obscure piece of trivia. ― Thailog 21:07, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
Never knew that. -- SFH 20:16, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
Another great piece of trivia. This is one of my favorites. - Caswin 23:33, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
Oppose
Comments
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed DYK. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Interesting that they got all three of them. -- SFH 20:16, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
That was a good episode. - Caswin 23:33, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
Oppose
Comments
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed DYK. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed DYK. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed DYK. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
… that Batman is the only character who has appeared in every DCAU animated series?
Support
This singularity (intentional of coincidental) should be pointed out. ― Thailog 21:07, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
Agreed. This bears mentioning. - Caswin 23:33, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
First one here, makes sense. -- SFH 21:39, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
Oppose
Comments
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed DYK. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
I think it's interesting. ― Thailog 18:53, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
Bit bit of a stretch, but it has an odd appeal to it. - Caswin 23:33, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
Oppose
Comments
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed DYK. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed DYK. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Batman Beyond has the distinction of being the DCAU show with more Annie Awards nominations. This bears mentioning. ― Thailog 21:24, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
People should know this. -- SFH 21:39, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
Oppose
Comments
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed DYK. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed DYK. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Many fans overlook this fact. ― Thailog 21:07, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
Oppose
Sorry, but I'm going to have to oppose this one. Granting that our policy is one of not going out of our way to hide spoilers, I feel that this one is a little big to throw out there in this context. - Caswin 23:33, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
Actually, I also want to recant my vote; this DYK is unceasingly sploiley. ― Thailog 10:53, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
Comments
My apologies; I misread the fact rather badly and am withdrawing my vote against it, though I am still a bit leery about including it. - Caswin 02:17, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed DYK. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
I'd prefer that DYWs would be more obscure, rather than something that is laid out for us on the shows. ― Thailog 21:07, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
Comments
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed DYK. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Not sure about this one. I think that this one, albeit funny, points out the ignorance of some viewers about this fact (as opposed to triviality). ― Thailog 21:07, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed DYK. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
… Kirk Langstrom was, chronologically, the first villain to appear in the DCAU?
Support
Curious. Maybe overlooked. ― Thailog 21:07, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
Not really thought about. -- SFH 23:35, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
Oppose
Comments
If this passes, I would like to clarify the phrasing a bit. While he was the first villain to appear in the DCAU, there have been plenty of others before him in the universe's timeline, which is what I usually think of when I hear "chronologically." - Caswin 23:33, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
Agreed and done. ― Thailog 12:52, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed DYK. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Plain fun fact. ― Thailog 12:51, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
Never knew that before know. If only Black Canary had gone along as well. -- SFH 23:35, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
Oppose
Comments
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed DYK. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed DYK. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed DYK. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Shows the magnitude of this character. ― Thailog 22:00, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
Always struck me as a little odd, but it is noteworthy. -- SFH 22:23, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
Oppose
Comments
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed DYK. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
I think it's a big deal. ― Thailog 09:56, 25 October 2008 (UTC)
Oppose
Comments
Suggest a reword: ... that Professor Hamilton coined the terms "Kryptonite" and "Fortress of Solitude"? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Supermorff (talk • contribs) 21:29, 28 November 2008 (UTC).
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed DYK. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed DYK. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Interesting. Maybe in May, when she's no longer featured. -- Tupka217 20:23, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
Oppose
Comments
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed DYK. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Actually, "except Zeta and Lobo". If this stays, there needs to be a reword, though, as JL is not a superhero; perhaps "title character(s)" or some such thing? -- Tupka217 20:23, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
Lobo isn't exactly characterized as a superhero. --Thejluninja 23:35, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
He had it own show, so he is "main", IMHO. -- Tupka217 09:29, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed DYK. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
People should know that. -- SFH 23:35, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
Oppose
Comments
If this passes, the pages with these characters should be updated. This way, the people who check up on it will learn more about the characters and possibly see the episode guides in which the characters appeared in. MrWhitman 18:32, 29 October 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed DYK. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Never realized this. ― Thailog 08:51, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
Oppose
Comments
This was due to the episode's first half occurring back in Superman's teen years, including a message from Jor-El and Lara, and the second half occurring in the present.--DCAUBatman 21:10, October 6, 2009 (UTC)
I know, but still, it has most actors. Least actors, btw, is "The Underdwellers", with only 4. -- Tupka217Talk 21:20, October 6, 2009 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed DYK. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Because it's quantifiable. --― Thailog 19:37, October 7, 2009 (UTC)
Agree. --Tupka217Talk 21:01, October 7, 2009 (UTC)
Oppose
Comments
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed DYK. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Tim Daly was the original and generally is the fan favorite voice for Superman, but few people know he played him in less episodes than his successor. ― Thailog 17:49, September 15, 2009 (UTC)
Is it worth also mentioning that Tim Daly reprised the role in Public Enemies?--OzzMan 11:39, December 29, 2009 (UTC)
Oppose
Comments
I counted 60 for George Newbern. Was Static Shock episode "Toys In The Hood" included?--DCAUBatman 21:12, October 15, 2009 (UTC)
I still count 59 with Static Shock included. ― Thailog 21:31, October 15, 2009 (UTC)
That's if you only count as Superman - George Newbern voiced Bizarro on 2 episodes without Superman - "The Great Brain Robbery" and "Alive!" —The preceding unsigned comment was added by DCAUBatman (talk • contribs) 05:22, October 16, 2009 (UTC).
That's the precise point of this DYK: to compare the number of times George Newbern voiced Superman to the times Tim Daly did. It's quite obvious in the sentence. ― Thailog 10:04, October 16, 2009 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed DYK. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Rosenbaum does deserve mention due to the fact that he played the same character on Smallville as on Justice League Unlimited, thanks to the Flash and Lex Luthor switching minds for one episode.
Oppose
Many actors played several characters. Unless it can be quantified, it is not relevant to stand out Michael Rosenbaum. ― Thailog 20:43, October 17, 2009 (UTC)
Comments
I like it if it's rephrased to specify the characters or the number. ― Thailog 21:07, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
Seeing the many uncrediteds he did and the ones we haven't identified yet, the exact number could be tricky. -- Tupka217 20:23, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
It should be mentioned that on the Justice League episode "Tabula Rasa", when Amazo was looking for Lex Luthor, he found Michael Rosenbaum on the phone.--DCAUBatman 18:03, October 12, 2009 (UTC)
A lot of actors did. for example, Mark Hamill in addition to the Joker was also Solomon Grundy among others. And Olivia D'abo was Morgan La fey, Star Sapphire and others. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.233.155.254 (talk)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this page.