From the DCAU Wiki, working on 1,873 articles

[edit] DVDs

I kinda did that because the images showed up in "Category:Batman Beyond television images", which they're not. Is there a ratio difference? Otherwise, wouldn't it just be the same? -- Tupka217^Talk 09:55, September 18, 2009 (UTC)

The difference is that they were not taken from Batman Beyond - Season One (DVD), and the point is to be truthful to the source. We should fix the filebox, not the images. ― Thailog 09:58, September 18, 2009 (UTC)

We probably need articles for all those promotional DVD's, then. -- Tupka217^Talk 10:03, September 18, 2009 (UTC)

I'll try to come up with a simpler solution. The last thing we need is categories for just one image. ― Thailog 11:18, September 19, 2009 (UTC)

[edit] IMDb

In the end, it's just as unreliable as Wikipedia. ;) Any fool with a web connection can add stuff. -- Tupka217^Talk 08:59, September 19, 2009 (UTC)

I always assumed that the selected few who approve submissions over there at least confirmed sources. ― Thailog 11:17, September 19, 2009 (UTC)

Nope, sadly not. I've always been under the impression that they always let anything slide except when I try to clean it up. If you look at an average movie's quote page, you'll see some quotes show up thrice. And some editors don't make articles for "new" actors, with no other credits. Or add redundant info (check SubZero) or conjecture (a lot of "Jack Napier"s at Mark Hamill's page). Or replace an actor's credited role with an (incorrect) uncredited role (Scott Patterson). IMDb is very, very flawed. -- Tupka217^Talk 11:27, September 19, 2009 (UTC)